Page 33 - January1948
P. 33

NATIONAL BUTTON BULLETIN                     31

        discussed, namely, an ivory back, with a heavy copper shank through the
        body. The buttons ln the last row show the same face technlque, but the
        backs are copper  instead of ivory,
            rn the first four specimens,  the palnted  satin. medallion  vr'as laid on a
        heavy ivory disc and covered with glass. It is not possible  to see whether
        the two buttons in the last row have ivory as a filler lnside but they are also
        glass covered.
            with the aid of a magnifying  grass you will be able to detect the dif-
        ferences which occur in hand woik.  These are particurarly  evident in the
        bot'der  designs which  va,ry in each quarter section.  Some  parts of the de-
        sign are darker than others  showing the artist had just  nitea nis pen;  in
        others the color fades out as the pen  becomes  empty.
            Flere again, we have work for the groups  wishing  to ittentify  new but-
        ton pictures. In all probability,  these identities mai be uncovered  in the
        very earliest  books on. Heraldry or the Mythology  known to each country.
        You will note that each border pattern  is different,  also. Let us hear trom
        anyone who knows the identities presented  here. These buttons  were used
        at the Forum discussion and are from the Kohn Collection.



                         CHINESE POTTERY  BUTTON
                              Tl-ris Chinese pottery  button was made in  Fukien
                            Plovince dur.iug the Tsin dynasty  in the Brd Century
                            (the same period  during which the building  of  the
                            Gleat WaIl was begun)
                              The type of decoi'ation on this button is accred_
                            ited to the Ch'in pottefs  who were often killed and
                            buried with their work, the art of making  the pot-
                            tery was thus kept a seclet.
                              The style of decoration  is known as the  ,,hori-
                            zontal S" or squared  S pattern  and it was known to
                            have been used on hard white pottery  as early as
                            1766 B. C.  Occasionally we find conventionalized  or
        nrythological  animals  combined with it and in this instance we rrave a dragon
        painted in chinese blue.  The ouilining  is done in black and green  color is
        also ernployed  in the decoration.  Tlle ware is glazed,  a"o irre ;';;tr"  is deep
        concave in shape, with a heavy self shank highly glazed.
            This button from the Kohn collection was used at the Fol'um and dis-
       cussed  by Judge  Pendleton.


                 SOUTH  AMERICAN  PRE-HISTORIC  BUTTONS

            For years I collected Indian'elics,  however.  since I began to assist Mrs.
       zand'er in collecting buttons some of the Indian relic dealeis losl a customer
       and were informed  that if they secured some interesting  buttons i  would  be
       glad  to hear from them. A year ago, one of the collector  dealers showed
       some  sherl artifacts  which were classified  as buttons by the archeologist  who
       excavated  them in santa Marta, columbia, south Amer.ica in 1g16. These
       so-called  buttons made of shell have a concave  boring in which aie rtrilled
       two smaller  holes, and are similar to the modern buitons excepf it at tt ey
       are rectangular  or  square instead of  round.  I  contacted  one of  thb
       archeologists  and asked if  any fragnrents of clothing were found so as to
       give positive proof  that these so-called  buttons  we|e actually used as but-
       tons instead of possibly  as. ornarnents.  The answer was that due to the
       estimated age of the ruins being 1100 A. D., any gar.ments  of fabric, skin,
       or glass  would have decomposed  so that ilrere was no di|ect evidence  of
       their use, but after some discussion ilre alcheologists  classified them as
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38